Canon ink is freaking out after shipping without crucial chips. Here’s how to fix it

Canon is reporting that it has been forced to ship ink cartridges without chips that identify ink levels, leading to error messages when the cartridges are inserted. The company has published a workaround while it sorts the issue out.

Canon reported that supply chain shortages have forced the printer manufacturer to ship consumable print cartridges without certain semiconductors inside them. Canon doesn’t describe exactly what these chips do, though a German support page (as discovered by TechRadar) says that they oversee “certain additional functions” such as toner level detection.

“To ensure a continuous and reliable supply of consumables, we have chosen to supply consumables without a semiconductor component until normal supply resumes,” Canon said via translation. “While there is no negative impact on print quality when consumables are used without electronic components, certain additional functions, such as .B toner level detection, may be affected.”

The issues seem to affect Canon’s ImageRunner line of multifunction printers for homes and small offices. While print quality won’t be affected, print quantity may be. If one of the printers uses the cartridges without a chip inside it, it will detect the toner level at either “100%” or “0%,” with nothing in between. If the toner is at 0%, it should be considered empty and replaced.

In the case of a printer like the ImageRunner C3025i, Canon will display the following error message. Canaon recommends that users simply press the “I agree” button to move on and print normally.

Canon

Canon did not say whether the new chips are also used to authenticate approved Canon-brand cartridges.

Google failed to compete with iMessage for years. Now it wants Apple to play nice.

Google took to Twitter this weekend to complain that iMessage is just too darn influential with today's kids. The company was responding to a Wall Street Journal report detailing the lock-in and social pressure Apple's walled garden is creating among US teens. iMessage brands texts from iPhone users with a blue background and gives them additional features, while texts from Android phones are branded green and only have the base SMS feature set. According to the article, "Teens and college students said they dread the ostracism that comes with a green text. The social pressure is palpable, with some reporting being ostracized or singled out after switching away from iPhones." Google apparently feels this is a problem.

"iMessage should not benefit from bullying," the official Android Twitter account wrote. "Texting should bring us together, and the solution exists. Let's fix this as one industry." Google SVP Hiroshi Lockheimer chimed in too, saying "Apple's iMessage lock-in is a documented strategy. Using peer pressure and bullying as a way to sell products is disingenuous for a company that has humanity and equity as a core part of its marketing. The standards exist today to fix this."

The "solution" Google is pushing here is RCS, or Rich Communication Services, a GSMA standard from 2008 that has slowly gained traction as an upgrade to SMS. RCS adds typing indicators, user presence, and better image sharing to carrier messaging. It is a 14-year-old carrier standard though, so it lacks many things you would want from a modern messaging service, like end-to-end encryption and support for nonphone devices. Google tries to band-aid over the aging standard with its "Google Messaging" client, but the result is a lot of clunky solutions which aren't as good as a modern messaging service.

Since RCS replaces SMS, Google has been on a campaign to get the industry to make the upgrade. After years of protesting, the US carriers are all onboard, and there is some uptake among the international carriers, too. The biggest holdout is Apple, which only supports SMS though iMessage.

Apple hasn't ever publicly shot down the idea of adding RCS to iMessage, but thanks to documents revealed in the Epic v. Apple case, we know the company views iMessage lock-in as a valuable weapon. Bringing RCS to iMessage and making communication easier with Android users would only help to weaken Apple's walled garden, and the company has said it doesn't want that.

In the US, iPhones are more popular with young adults than ever. As the Wall Street Journal notes, "Among U.S. consumers, 40% use iPhones, but among those aged 18 to 24, more than 70% are iPhone users." It credits Apple's lock-in with apps like iMessage for this success.

Reaping what you sow

Google clearly views iMessage's popularity as a problem, and the company is hoping this public-shaming campaign will get Apple to change its mind on RCS. Having Google give other companies advice on a messaging strategy is a laughable idea though, since Google probably has the least credibility of any tech company when it comes to messaging services. If the company really wants to do something about iMessage, it should try competing with it.

As we recently detailed in a 25,000-word article, Google's messaging history is one of constant product startups and shutdowns. Thanks to a lack of product focus or any kind of top-down mandate from Google's CEO, no division is really "in charge" of messaging. As a consequence, the company has released 13 halfhearted messaging products since iMessage launched in 2011. If Google has anyone to blame for the iMessage's dominance, it should start with itself, since it has continually sabotaged and abandoned its own plans to make an iMessage competitor.

Further Reading

A decade and a half of instability: The history of Google messaging apps

Messaging is important, and even if it isn't directly monetizable, a dominant messaging app has real, tangible benefits for an ecosystem. The rest of the industry understood this years ago. Facebook paid $22 billion to buy WhatsApp in 2014 and took the app from 450 million users to 2 billion users. Along with Facebook Messenger, Facebook has two dominant messaging platforms today, especially internationally. Salesforce paid $27 billion for Slack in 2020, and Tencent's WeChat, a Chinese messaging app, is pulling in 1.2 billion users and yearly revenues of $5.5 billion. Snapchat is up to a $67 billion market cap, and Telegram is getting $40 billion valuations from investors. Google keeps trying ideas in this market, but it never makes an investment that is anywhere close to the competition.

Google once had a functional competitor to iMessage in the past, called Google Hangouts. Circa 2015, Hangouts was a messaging powerhouse, which in addition to the native Hangouts messaging, also received SMS and Google Voice messages. Hangouts did group video calls five years before Zoom blew up, and it had clients on Android, iOS, the web, Gmail, and every desktop OS via a Chrome extension.

As usual though, Google lacked any kind of long-term plan or ability to commit to a single messaging strategy, and Hangouts only survived as the "everything" messenger for a single year. By 2016, Google moved on to the next shiny messaging app and left Hangouts to rot.

Even if Google could magically roll out RCS everywhere, RCS is a poor standard to build a messaging platform on because it is dependent on a carrier phone bill. It's anti-internet and can't natively work on webpages, PCs, smartwatches, and tablets, because those things don't have SIM cards. The carriers designed RCS, so RCS puts your carrier bill at the center of your online identity, even when free identification methods like e-mail exist and work on more devices. Google is just promoting carrier lock-in as a solution to Apple lock-in.

Despite Google's whining about iMessage, it seems to have learned nothing from its years of messaging failure. Today, Google messaging is the worst and most fragmented it has ever been. As of press time, the company runs eight separate messaging platforms, none of which talk to each other: there is Google Messages/RCS, which is being promoted today, but there's also Google Chat/Hangouts, Google Voice, Google Photos Messages, Google Pay Messages, Google Maps Business Messages, Google Stadia Messages, and Google Assistant Messaging. Those last couple apps aren't primarily messaging apps but have all ended up rolling their own siloed messaging platform because no dominant Google system exists for them to plug into.

It is an incredible mess, and no single Google product is as good as Hangouts was in 2015. So while Google goes backwards, it has resorted to asking other tech companies to please play nice with it while it continues to fumble though an incoherent, fragmented messaging strategy.

Curious to see what your actual internet speeds look like? An internet speed test is just what you need

You may think that the speed of the connection promised in your home internet package is what you're consistently getting -- but that's not usually true. For starters, your speeds will dip with range when you're connected wirelessly, over Wi-Fi. Speeds can slow down or fluctuate during times of peak usage, too, and they can come crashing down if your provider enforces data caps or throttles connections to maintain overall network performance.

But there's an easy way to keep an eye on your home's internet speeds, and that's with an internet speed test. You've got lots of free options online to choose from and might even be able to run one from the same app that you used to set up your router. In most cases, running a test is as easy as pressing "Go," and won't take more than a minute or so.  Check out all the tests here:

How to freeze your credit -- and why you might want to

The experience of having your personal data compromised is so common it is just about normal these days. Nearly half (47%) of Americans experienced financial identity theft in 2020, with losses totaling $712.4 billion, according to a recent report by Aite Group, an independent research and advisory firm. 

If you're a victim of a data breach or you suspect your identity may have been stolen, you should consider freezing your credit. When you freeze your credit, it prevents criminals from accessing your credit report or opening new accounts in your name. 

While a credit freeze won't undo any criminal activity that's already taken place, it can protect you from further fraud. Here's what you need to know about credit freezes and how to set them up.

Click here for the rest of the article:

Want better Wi-Fi? Here's the best place to put your router

Is there anything more grating than slow Wi-Fi? Even though you paid your monthly fees to an internet service provider (ISP) and took the time to have a technician install your router professionally, you still might spend too much time watching your computer grind. But luckily, there may be an easy fix -- changing your router placement. 

There are a lot of factors that determine internet speeds and while there's a few tricks or guidelines you can follow to improve the overall wireless speeds and coverage in your home, one of the most crucial factors is the location of your router. So keep reading to learn about the best place in your home for your router and other tricks for good Wi-Fi.

Check out the rest of the article here at Cnet.com

How to Completely Disappear From the Internet

Some might say the internet was built on anonymity, paving the way for a place where free speech reigns supreme. But after years of learning about who's snooping into everything we do online, privacy on the web is hardly a given.

It's not just about government spying; it's also about how much data big companies such as Amazon, Google, Facebook, and Microsoft have collected in order to serve up targeted ads—not to mention how much of your personal data gets scooped up in all the breaches and hacks.

There are always going to be good reasons for people to go online without being tracked. For one, anonymity may be the only way for a real whistleblower to reveal corruption, considering how some have been treated. But there's nothing wrong with wanting to stay anonymous, no matter what you're doing.

Is it even possible to take control of your own personal privacy online? Ultimately, the only way to stay truly anonymous online is...not to go online at all. That's not a real option for most of us, though. Here's a rundown of what you can do to minimize spying, targeted ads, and ID theft as you explore the online world .

Click here for the rest of the article on PCmag.com